Personal Characteristics and Adversity Quotient of Academic Administrators among Selected State Universities and Colleges in Eastern Visayas, Philippines

Analiza B. Calles, Loreta M. Besoyo

Abstract


Given the high degree of accountability and responsibility of academic administrators in leading and managing the school organization, their ability to withstand adversity and unprecedented difficulties called adversity quotient (AQ) is vital. This study aimed to determine the relationship between academic administrators' personal characteristics and their AQ. Respondents consisted of 108 administrators from selected state universities and colleges in Eastern Visayas Region. Data were gathered using a questionnaire that elicited personal characteristics and AQ. The control, ownership, reach and endurance (CORE) are the dimensions that measured the level of AQ. Most of the academic administrators were female, married and in middle adult age group. The highest educational qualifications attained by the respondents were doctorate degrees and they have been in the academe for more than 21 years with academic rank of Associate Professors I-V. Results revealed that in general, respondents have low AQ which indicate their low capacity to be resilient on adversities and challenges. Age, civil status and highest educational attainment are the best predictors of reach. Only the academic rank was a significant predictor for endurance. The level of control and reach of the respondents had significant relationship to adversity quotient.


Keywords


adversity quotient profile, adversity quotient dimensions, control, ownership, reach, endurance, resilience

References


Abramson, L., Alloy, L., Hankin, B., Haeffel, G., MacCoon, D., & Gibb, B. (2002). Cognitive vulnerability-stress models of depression in a self-regulatory and psychobiological context. In I. Gotlib & C. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of depression. New York: The Guilford Press.

Bautista, M.J.C.(2015), Adversity quotient and teaching performance of faculty members. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication, Volume 5, Issue 3, March 2015.

Ferrer, M (2009). Relationship of Personal Characteristics, Leadership Styles, and Job Satisfaction to Adversity Quotient of Academic Heads of Selected Colleges and Universities in the National Capital Region. Unpublished Dissertation of the Polytechnic University of the

Philippines. Retrieved from www.peaklearning.com (accessed June 5, 2012).

Hersey, P. and K.H. Blanchard (1977). Management of Organizational Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lefcourt, H.M. (1992). Durability and Impact of the Locus of Control Construct. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 411-414.

Peterson, S.F. Maeir, and M. Seligman (1993), Learned Helplessness: A theory for Age of Personal Control. London: Oxford University Press

Peterson, C., Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L.Y., Metalsky, G.I., and Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The attributional style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287-299.

Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectations for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychology Monographs, 70 (1).

Stoltz, Paul G. (1997) Adversity Quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. Canada: John Willey and Sons, Inc.

Stoltz, Paul G (2000) Adversity quotient at work: Make everyday challenge the key to your success-putting principles of AQ into action. N.Y.: HarperCollins Publishing, Inc.

Tancinco N. et al. (2013). Managing Conicts in State Universities and Colleges in Eastern Visayas, Journal of Society and Technology, Vol.3:23-36)

Venkatesh, J. et.al.(2015) Adversity Quotient Profile: An effective Psychometric tool to hire the finest aspirant for contemporary organization. Scholar Journal of Economics, 2(12) 1159-1164


Full Text: JST_2015 13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.